Monday, May 21, 2012

Protecting the wolves of Yellowstone



Protecting the wolves that howl
            Ever wonder about Yellowstone and the wolves?  Do the wolves cause harm to Yellowstone National Park? The answer to these questions is no. 

            In fact, it is quite the opposite as residents of Wyoming they need to take an initiative to protect the wolves.  What would others purport when dealing with this situation? What are some refutations that some people or organizations would come up with?  According to Smithsonianmag.com, reporter Frank Clifford, “after wolves killed five of his cows, he consulted with federal wildlife officials, who pass sentence on incorrigible wolves. “The feds proposed taking out the whole pack and we acquiesced," he said. 

This particular quote was from Roger Lang. 

Realistically, what it demonstrates is Lang’s displeasure with the problem of wolves attacking his cattle herd. As the reader can understand this happens to be an isolated case.

            Wolves provide many different answers to Yellowstone Park do their nature. But they should not be held accountable for killing farmer’s animals.

According to Wyoming.sierraclub.org Protecting Wolves in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem article, there is the idea that wolves will kill any type of livestock or animals but apparently there is a low instance of this happening.  And what happens if a farmer’s goat, sheep, or cow roams outside of the boundaries? Well, what happens is the wolves will come and kill the animal. The farmer will probably get aggravated at the lack of control of wolves and propose the government do something about it. What do the farmers get in return?  What the farmers actually do get is compensation from Uncle Sam. Yes, that’s right the farmers get monetary help for Jodie or Billie the cow biting the dust do to a wolf.  Even if it happens there is not a lot of wolves meandering through farmers lots and picking off sheep and cows.

            Picture a grey wolf looking inquisitively at an elk. The grey wolf beautiful in color looks at the snow and then looks up at the elk.  The wolf runs rapidly through the forest and lunges for the elk and misses. The wolf then decides to attack the elk and brings it down successfully. The blood from the elk oozes out of the wound.  The elk is dead but this is not a bad thing because apparently it is important for the other Yellowstone creatures and wildlife. As a whole interworking system this maintains that the wolf is fed but the scavengers and other animals are able to eat as well.

According to yellowstonepark.com Reintroduction Changes Ecosystem article, it talks of the very nature of the ever changing lands that are Yellowstone National Park.  Not only has this but it exercised the idea that the wolves are integral part to Yellowstone.  The main reason the mangy dogs are helpful to the park is providing food for other wildlife. Chris Wilmers is a biologist and he expanded on the idea that at one time elk would die from the hardened winters. This was probably because the snow pack would have prevented the elk from eating.  No matter, the point is now the other wildlife would rely on the freshly killed elk for food. In effect, it set off a chain of reactions that inevitably leads to a changed as he words it ‘ecosystem’.

            Wolves can provide a natural cure to overcrowding of elk. They will kill elk but this provides the means for controlling overpopulation of the elk that roam and tromp through the Yellowstone lands. 

According to nationalparkstraveler.com Kurt Repanshek, he writes about how wolves should help keep the elk population down to a reasonable number. He talks to a Doug Smith. He happens to be Yellowstone's wolf project leader. “"Is predation a factor? Absolutely, a huge one. But we can't weight it," he said. "The feedback is that it's all wolves, and that's not the case." This quote was from Doug Smith.

            Conclusion: Based on this information it is imperative that we protect the wolves at Yellowstone. If we don’t there will not be as rich a balance in terms of Yellowstone Park. The wolves keep the elk population down by killing some of the elk.

           

           

 




Tuesday, May 15, 2012

American populace not happy about Afghanistan



Obama needs to pull out of Afghanistan

Pundits would say we’re only in Afghanistan for the reason of national security.  But is there truth to that?  They would also like to attack the very nature of why we are in Afghanistan in the first place. They look to arguments that deal with the U.S. is attacking Al-Qaeda with ferocious intensity.  If the U.S. was to pull out of Afghanistan it would cause massive instability within the country.

            Bin laden was found and killed.  The war in Afghanistan has taken a large toll on not just the U.S. soldiers but the world in general.  More, than 1,964 American service men and women have lost their lives in the conflict. Not only this, the economic toll staggering costing the U.S. over $527 billion.  What is not that shocking is the non-favoritism from the American people regarding the Afghan war. 

·         According to Joe Glenton of Stop the War Coalition,  NATO is a big problem.

·         According to Anne Gearan of the Huffington Post/AP, the favoritism for the war in Afghanistan is very low. She said that there was a poll done and of the poll just about 66 percent wanted the U.S. out of Afghanistan.

·          According to ABC News , correspondent Gary Langer said that roughly 60 percent don’t favor the war. And another 30% don’t really even see why we’re truly there.

            So what is the closing opinion?  Well, as stated for quite some time the vote to stay in Afghanistan is unpopular. Furthermore, it behooves us as Americans to consider what we’re doing in Afghanistan. The bottom line is we need to pull our troops out of Afghanistan.